TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW
I hope Stormy had to pay Trump back every penny for opening her mouth (again, I’m sure) breaking her NDA! Broken contract.
Alvin Bragg along with the judge is this case need to be held accountable.
BREAKING: Trump Appeals Alvin Bragg!!!
This gets ever MAGA fired up. But it Bullshit going nowhere. The case with Trump & Stormy is closed. Done & legally flushed down the toilet. The hard evidence that Michael Cohen delivered to the courts irrefutable. Move on people. (I am a Reagan Republican.) Trump has screwed us all over! Economy, Farmers, Consumer Prices, Energy prices, Inflation and Health care.
You’re just too stupid or were born with insufficient brain function if you believe Trump was given a fair trial on those bllsht charges made up by BRAGG and his crew of DOJ attorneys that were put in by BIDEN. Classic case of using GOVT. LAWFARE against your political opponent
Bob, your statement that one has to be either too stupid or born with insufficient brain function to believe Trump was given a fair trial on thos …….charges made up by BRAGG and his crew …….
Labeling people who believe differently than you, Bob, is something you clearly have in common with Donald Trump. I see the U.S. as a democracy that should promote people expressing their personal thoughts and ideas. If we disagree, that is time for debate not to denigrate……..
Since you claim to be a Reagan republican, you don’t seem to remember Reagan said don’t speak ill of your fellow republican. I doubt if you were even alive when Reagan was president. I remember how Reagan handled the farm crises. Even though it was caused by Jimmy Carter, Reagan did a lousy job trying to fix the farm crises. It took Reagan over 6 years to fix the mess Jimmy made and yet, Trump had 80% of Oboob’s mess fixed within 2 years of his first term, despite fighting the dummycrats and RINOs. Now Trump is well on his way to fixing shitpants Joe’s mess and he’s only been back for 10.5 months. All those issues you claim Trump screwed up were screwed up by shitpants Joe, not Trump, and it’s little Upchuck Schumer who is preventing anything from being fixed right now. Can sure tell you’re a RINO or a dummycrat. Get the hell out of the republican party! We don’t need backstabbing RINOs.
Right on Dog!
Name caller…..are you in middle school or are you just acting like it while copying Donald Trump.
Obviously, you must be still reading the old issues of the NYT, WP, Politico etc & watching bygone political news clips of the MSM. We now know, that the only thing that was screwed up, was electing the Commie Barry 0 & his follow up Joe (where am I) Biden. DJT has cleaned up 75 % of the BS that these 2 useless, anti American, scumbags left behind in just 11 months!! You suffer from a bad case of TDS, take your meds & enjoy the ride!
Every word you typed is pure fantasy. You’ve failed to achieve your propaganda goals, as only those completely out of touch with reality would believe even a single word you presented as true. Perhaps it’s time to revisit your communist handbook for some remedial training, comrade.
You sure you are not a dumcrat because you are just as fucking stupid as they are! Open you eyes moron Trump is great for this country! What a dumb ass you are!!!!
BS Just like the scam trial
ANY ONE THAT BELIEVES A PORN STAR AND A PROVEN LIAR OF LAWYER THAT WOULD GIVE UP THEIR OWN MOTHERS TO BE EXECUTED IS A MORON WITH THE IQ OF SNAIL
Chapter is a SCAM! You have my permission to quote me!
This story is a classic case of losing sight of the forest for all the trees. Trump was accused of making false entries in the business records of an enterprise. However, the indictment does not specify how, or in what way, this was done.
The indictment does not say, for example, that entry #123, entered as xxxx, should have been entered as yyyy. It simply claims that the entry was false, and makes no explanation how this conclusion was reached.
More to the point, 22 of the 34 items listed in the indictment (11 invoices and 11 checks) were not “entries” at all. Invoices and checks may indeed be entered into the accounting records of an enterprise, but they are not entries themselves. The difference should be apparent to anyone who has kept a checkbook: Banks make payments based upon the actual check, not based upon what has been entered in the checkbook.
So did DT make or cause false entries to be made in his business records? The invoices submitted by MC were neither forged, altered, or counterfeit. They appear to have been properly approved, vouchered, and paid. He accepted and cashed the checks. Where is the falsification?
If Mr. Bragg & Company were handling matters, what would they have done differently? How would they have entered these items without themselves being guilty of record falsification? (See Aesops fable about the Crab and his Mother).
A couple of additional points. It has been alleged that payments made by MC on behalf of DT were intended to influence the 2016 election. Apparently everyone has forgotten that DT was not expected to win that election. Indeed, he was expected to lose, and lose big. Two days before the payments to SD, the WP published an article which claimed his chances of winning the election “…were approaching ZERO”. Trump himself did not expect to win the election. Under these circumstances, it is difficult to see how making or failing to pay SD would have made any difference to DT’s election prospects, esp as these payments were made months after his surprise victory.
I find it troubling that Trump’s attorneys did not raise these issues during the trial, or even ask that they be addressed in the jury instructions. Even now, on appeal, these issues are apparently being ignored. Why?
Evidently you didn’t follow the Trail. Trumps Lawyers tried probably hundreds of times but that so called Judge actually told her to Sit Down and Shut Up more then once. He refused to allow questioning of certain subjects and when he didn’t like a question he quickly said move along. As it was that So Called Judge should have Immediately Recused himself because of the Number of Times he sent Large Campaign Contributions to Democrats and only Democrats. Just that information should have been enough to have him removed from the Case. Seeing thar the Constitution guarantees a Jury of your Peers the Trial should have been moved to Westchester County so a number of Conservative Republicans could have been chosen instead of the Trump Hating Liberal Democrats that were selected . Then we have the Illegal Acts of DA Bragg , the NY State DA and the NY Governor who handpicked that 90 period where Trump was not in NYC to Illegally change the NY Statute of Limitations. Plus everyone with 2 or more functional brain cells knew this Trail was a Hoax ment to derail Trumps chances of becoming President again. Imagine a Republican leaning Judge Demanding a Democrat Presidential candidate Sit in his courtroom Monday thru Friday instead of allowing them to hit the Campaign Trail. Thereby Riots,Lootings and Arsons in every city if that happened
This was a perversion of the law as never used before and multiple grounds to be thrown out and will be.
1. They used a misdemeanor years past the statute of limitations-means legally cannot EVER be used against him. 2. For the first time ever they said that unusable misdemeanor combined with any 1 of another 5 misdemeanors -none of which he was charged with, violating his due process -equaled felony election interference. 3. But the jury was never instructed on the elements of the offense -so they know what has to be proven to prove that crime happened. 4. Multiple accountants testified entering “legal fees” to money paid to a law firm is accepted norm in accounting because once the money leaves your hands, you have no control how it’s used. What’s entered in the LAWYER’S books is what counts. 5. Judge instructed jury to assume his guilt on the unusable misdemeanor and if they agreed he committed any of the ones he wasn’t charged with, they could find him guilty of the felony election interference. And they didn’t even need to agree on which one of the other 5 they thought he did-though SCOTUS had ruled in an earlier case juries must always be unanimous in all underlying issues.
Anyone who thinks this is a legit case should be their next victim. NYC has the 2nd most corrupt court system in the US for real reasons.
Following the trial was like following a soap opera.
The prosecution called numerous witnesses over several weeks; the defence? called 2? witnesses, and ignored the most important aspect of the case – whether the items listed in the indictment were fraudulent.
The defence called no forensic accountants to challenge the prosecution’s claim of entry falsification,
and no pollsters to challenge the claim that MC’s payments to SD were made to influence an election that most experts felt was already out of reach.
Jury instructions did not reference cases like United States v. Yates, 16 F.4th 256 (9th Cir. 2021), which noted that the offense of false entry “is not committed where the transaction entered actually took place, and is entered exactly as it occurred.” Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 463 (1895). That is so “even though it is a part of a fraudulent or otherwise illegal scheme.” United States v. Erickson, 601 F.2d 296, 302 (7th Cir. 1979)
Accounting entries are necessarily brief and concise. They do not lend themselves easily to falsification. In this case, each entry can be traced back to the appropriate check, voucher and approved invoice. Where was the falsification?