TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW
Destiny perfectly represents all female leftists.
Cenk gets angry over nothing, Piers agrees with him and he STILL gets angry
‘You Are Inhuman!’ Piers Morgan DISGUSTED By Destiny’s Take On Trump Shooting
TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW
Destiny perfectly represents all female leftists.
Cenk gets angry over nothing, Piers agrees with him and he STILL gets angry
Destiny is wrong and he knows it, that is why he keeps trying to out talk everyone on the panel. He is an immature screaming petulant child , demanding his way! What a loser! Anyone who watches him is as bad as he is! Glad he was defunded by x. His bullshit rhetoric is just that, pure unhinged bullshit!
Step back and look at the big picture — would the international corporate elite that runs things behind the scenes entrust its plan to assassinate Donald Trump to an untrained 20-year old using a semi-automatic rifle to shoot at distance?
“Thomas Matthew Crooks” was allowed to be where he was with the full knowledge and cooperation of the Secret Service, FBI, local police, etc. — but “Thomas Matthew Crooks” was no assassin.
There are only two possibilities:
1. This was a real assassination attempt, with —
A) As noted, the full cooperation of the Secret Service, FBI, local police, etc.,
B) A patsy, “Thomas Matthew Crooks” — possibly real, most likely a complete invention — in place as the diversionary fall guy, with a fictional backstory to support the official narrative; and
C) Multiple shooters — professionals — nearby (perhaps in the audience with a handgun to the left of Trump, perhaps at some far-away rooftop or window with a bolt-action rifle), shooting at Trump and just missing what would have been a perfect head shot.
Or,
2. This was a hoax assassination attempt, intended to make Donald Trump appear even more of an epic hero who will save us, with —
A) The full cooperation of the Secret Service, FBI, local police, etc. — and Donald Trump;
B) A patsy, “Thomas Matthew Crooks” — possibly real, most likely a complete invention — in place as the diversionary fall guy, with a fictional backstory to support the official narrative;
C) Multiple shooters — possibly including the patsy “Thomas Matthew Crooks” — shooting blanks; and
D) Fake “civilian” casualties to help sell the event as real.
The second possibility explains why everyone in the stands behind Trump and those in the audience in front didn’t hit the deck immediately after the first shots; they knew there was no real danger. Anyone who has ever observed a real shooting knows that people instinctively get as low as possible or run away. Did you see much of that at the July 13 event? Donald Trump addressed this point at his acceptance speech at the convention, attributing the counter-intuitive actions of those near him to their courage and loyalty. . .
Both possibilities also explain another curiosity — why the corporate media broadcast so many interviews with people near the rooftop perch of “Thomas Matthew Crooks”, yet so few with those in the stands in back of Trump or in the audience in front . . .
this guy from the young Turks is a mannaric
I used to watch him. then his true colors came out
every fen Monday morning QB
as what is coming out is that this was a inside job to kill Trump
this is a waist of time